Sunday, April 12, 2009
Sex talk
Cooter: What do you mean by "talk about sex"?
Nap: He means communicating in the universal language - talking is a misnomer
El Guapo: No, no - he means talking in the heat of passion
Utz: That's right - using the language of a 1-800-comealloverme operator
Commish: 1-800-comealloverme?
Big Dog: I need to write that number down
Commish: You guys are way off - I mean talking about it outside of actually doing it
Cooter: I'm sorry to say that I understand them better than I understand you
Hoops: I'll help you out - I think you mean talking with your spouse about sex as to what works and what doesn't - or stuff that you fantasize about
Nap: You're supposed to talk about that?
Cooter: With your spouse?
Commish: Alright, have you gotten the preliminaries out of your system?
Utz: 1-800-comealloverme focuses on getting other things out of your system
Big Dog: I really need that number
Hoops: I think the answer is no
El Guapo: I'll be happy to lead this one off
Commish: Finally
El Guapo: My wife and I definitely talk about sex
Commish: To what end?
Utz: That's too easy
El Guapo: Like hoops said before...about preferences, trying new stuff
Nap: No way, we're not talking about it
Commish: Are you doing it?
Nap: We're doing it - somewhat - but we're not talking about it
Cooter: We're not talking about it and we're not doing it
Hoops: Nice - We're talking about it a little
Big Dog: There's a doctrine for me
Utz: I'm getting the sense that the more you talk, the more you do
Commish: Sounds like what we're hearing - and you?
Utz: Well, we're not talking, but we're definitely doing
Cooter: So you don't need to be talking?
Utz: No, it's all in the doing!
Cooter: I'm striking out either way
Commish: I guess we're talking a little - like Hoops - and when we do it feels pretty good - healthy
El Guapo: It helps to get you where you want to be - I recommend it
Utz: How would it help me?
Hoops: It wouldn't - all you need is some Frank Sinatra and a semi-willing partner
Commish: That reminds me of another issue - when you're doing it, do you prefer to have music on, have the TV on, or to have no sound at all?
El Guapo: I'm all for TV - maybe even some Sportscenter
Utz: Are you working the sandwich at the same time as well?
Hoops: El Guapo, I thought you were really into music?
El Guapo: March Madness must be affecting me
Cooter: No noise for me
Nap: Does that count you and your wife?
Cooter: and the dog
Nap: Silence is golden
Commish: Anybody with me for a little music?
Big Dog: I'd be with you, but I've got to go make a call
Nap: as should we all
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
If Old Flames Aren't Hot, Can They Still Burn You?
Sunday, February 8, 2009
To Dine or Not to Dine
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Cheatin’ Colleague
Once everyone ordered food and drinks, one of the guys jumped right in with the first issue of the night. “I got an issue . . . and it involves sex.”
Doc piped in “It’s about time we had a sex issue – been way too long. And really, are there any other kinds of issues? Okay, seriously, what have you got?”
“A colleague of mine asked me to, er, help them with a little project. This person is having an affair and is planning on going away next weekend with their side interest. The cover story is that its for a work conference and I’ve been asked to - should inquiries be made - affirm that indeed we are going out of town for a conference.”
Nails spoke up. “We need some clarification. Will you be called before the conference? During it?”
“Forget that. Do you know the spouse? Is this a good friend of yours? Seems like the answer shouldn’t depend on this stuff, but I guess it does.” Big Dog was usually pretty insightful when it came to spousal issues.
The guy who brought up the issue said “I told you everything pertinent. You need to make your own assumptions on this one. I’m not really sure that any of those details matter. What do you think I should do? What would you do?’
Nails responded first. “I don’t see how there’s any way you can say yes. It doesn’t matter if the spouse actually calls, it doesn’t matter if you know the spouse – cheating is just wrong and if you enable, or at least condone it, you’d be in the wrong too. I think you respond by encouraging them to seek counseling and not have the affair.”
Big Dog agreed. “It could be tempting, especially if this is a real good friend of yours. But I don’t think you want to get involved in something like that.”
El Guapo demurred. “I might be in the minority on this, but I think you’ve got to consider it. Think of the cost versus benefit. Chances are you’re not going to get called on it, your colleague will owe you big time regardless and what the hell do you care what this person does in their private life.”
I finally spoke up. “I’m kind of surprising myself on this one but I have to agree with El Guapo, though definitely not for the same reasons. Look, it depends on what assumptions you make. One, I’m assuming the person who asked you is a good friend, not just a colleague. Two, maybe their marriage sucks or maybe you know the spouse is evil and you never thought they’d be good together and you knew they weren’t going to last. Maybe you know the spouse is cheating. Who knows? But I’m assuming that this is a real good friend in a lousy marriage and you got to be there for your friend. Like Nails said, encourage them to not do it, encourage counseling or a divorce, but in the end you got to be there for your friend.”
Most of the guys disagreed with me – felt the moral and ethical lines were pretty clear. In retrospect, despite my answer at the time, I’m not sure what I’d do, but I still think it depends on what assumptions you make.
Post script: After everyone spoke up, the guy who brought up the issue revealed that (1) the colleague was a woman (I’m pretty sure we all assumed it was a man) and (2) he didn’t really know her that well and was pretty shocked to be asked. He told her he didn’t feel comfortable doing it. But he also told us that he could imagine circumstances where he might be willing to cover for a friend.